Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (2994)	9/10/2009 8:03:42 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 69300

<No, I won't run away with anything. Instead of trying to shift to some esoteric semantic issue, lets just say I continue to think its not good for a science magazine to have a non-scientist writing a pro-atheist column.> Oh, I agree... Then you shouldn't be arguing with me about this imo. but you original assertion was that the periodical was on par with a real Scientific Journal and indicative of "scientist"... Is that still you belief? Pretty much. I don't distinguish between "real scientific journals" and magazines like the one in question and most people don't. I am sure there's a difference thats important to you. The type of journals you're probably meaning are read only by a handful of folks, don't exist out of university libraries, and the general public don't even know exist. I consider the popular conceptions of science in our society important.