To: Brumar89 who wrote (73993 ) 9/24/2009 1:54:11 PM From: TimF 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947 Ace posted an update to that -- In an update, he's reminded that when the NYT refused to cover Chas Freeman's flame-out as National Intelligence Council chair (due to anti-Israel animus and other such things), the NYT similarly claimed Freeman wasn't a high-enough ranking (would-be) official for it to spare its precious journalistic resources for. The National Intelligence Council chairman. Kinda sounds important. Thanks to ArthurK.ace.mu.nu and from the comments 3 Wow, inflation is a bitch. Having a $30B budget and the mandate to regulate 60% of our GNP doesn't make you important enough for the Times to acknowledge your existence. Posted by: Jean at September 10, 2009 01:31 PM (L64A6) 8 NYT, please give us a number for when an official enters 'high ranking status.' $40 billion? $50 billion? does this mean nobody in the House or Senate is a high ranking person, either? After all, they have to get a majority of supporting votes to throw around such volumes of tax payer funds. Posted by: epobirs at September 10, 2009 01:36 PM (tZS2Z) 17 A stoned-out cub reporter on a junior high school paper could have written an in-depth expos? in between bong hits with all the info that was out there!!!!! What an absolute crock... Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 10, 2009 01:40 PM (9Cooa) 25Another is that despite being a so-called "czar," Mr. Jones was not a high-ranking official. My BS meter needle is about to bust through the scale! Give me a break! If a low level staffer who's main function was to bring the coffee and donuts to George Bush's office had signed a petition sponsered by an Aryan Nation organization, it would have been front page news with multiple feature stories, appearing over a number of weeks on the front page above the fold. Posted by: runningrn at September 10, 2009 01:48 PM (D2il9) minx.cc