Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Feline who wrote (748)	10/30/1997 12:31:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Very good, Feline. I am impressed with both your analysis and your eloquence. I agree beaucoup--the angle vs. vertical holes may be very telling of an exploration staff a bit confused with their geophysical targets. Good to finally see Donner-Teck fess up to the fact they were drilling on a trend of EM anomalies--gravity anomalies can be so fickle sometimes <grin>. Have they posted their EM-anomaly map any where?? However, I do like seeing the disseminated mineralization opening up to the NE (e.g.,Thanx again, Ed) on the x-section. FYI, DFR's early Eastern Deeps drilling campaign (DFR's DDH 166/166a-thru-202) did have some similarities to Ed's x-section. I think Donner-Teck need to do acquire some deep-looking geophysics (i.e., not gravity). I'm still skeptical, but am starting to like the potential of South Voisey a bit more. Maybe I'll even buy some too with a better intercept. Best Regards, T.