Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (323864)	9/12/2009 10:09:42 AM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793835

You don't need 1500 pages of law to solve the problem you identify. Clearly their goal is much much larger and THAT is what I oppose.

To: quehubo who wrote (323864)	9/14/2009 9:58:33 PM
From: steve harris	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793835

I appreciate your comments, but turning over health care to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac similar disaster is not the solution. If you think it wouldn't be a disaster then name a current government agency you would have taking over the health care industry. If I had free medical insurance, I'd quit my job tomorrow, retire, and go fishing so where's the incentive? We've already got generations of welfare recipients. Welfare hasn't been an incentive to go back to work, so having me pay for health care for people that don't have health care isn't the solution, only a politician's effort to buy more votes. I think reducing the ridiculous government constraints you mentioned we already have screwing the insurance companies would be a good first step.