Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MJ who wrote (72023)	9/13/2009 8:28:07 PM
From: lorne	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

New Hampshire Secretary of State Will Investigate Whether Obama’s Name Belonged On Ballots. Posted in Uncategorized on September 13, 2009 by naturalborncitizen naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com In a story that appears to have gone largely unnoticed on this big news weekend, John Charlton of The Post And Mail reported yesterday that the New Hampshire Secretary of State – at the request of a New Hampshire State Representative – will investigate whether fraud was involved with regard to Obama’s name appearing on the ballot in New Hampshire: NH SECRETARY OF STATE AGREES TO INVESTIGATE by John Charlton (Sept. 12, 2009) — New Hampshire State Representative, Lawrence M. Rappaport payed a visit to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State, on Thursday, Sept. 10th. His stunning request: an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama’s presence on the NH 2008 Ballot. Gardner’s stunning response: an investigation will commence. I interviewed Mr. Rappaport by email, and asked him, on what basis did he make his complaint; he responded, “The basis for all of this is possible fraud. I don’t know what penalties will be assessed if fraud is proven.” Rappaport’s action follows stunning revelations that Nancy Pelosi deliberately signed two different forms certifying Barack Hussein Obama was the Democratic National Party candidate for the presidency. While these forms have been known to exist for some time, it was J.B. Williams, writing for the Canadian Free Press who brought them national notoriety, earlier this week. It is unclear, if, in the eventuality that New Hampshire determines fraud was committed, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, if the State will move, through its governor, to take some sort of action on the National scene, or who would be liable in law for the crime committed in-state. Those familiar with the cases brought by Cort Wrotnowski (Connecticut) and myself (New Jersey) will recall that we each sued the Secretary of State for failing to perform the ministerial duty assigned to them regarding their responsibility to protect the integrity of the ballots according to state statutes and their Constitutional oath of office. Both of these cases made the unique argument that these two legal duties, state and federal, were fused in the Secretary of State who is the head of elections in each respective state. Any investigation by Secretary of State Gardner needs to start with an investigation of what he personally did to verify the eligibility of Obama as that was his responsibility to the voters of New Hampshire. If Secretary of State Gardner was unaware that Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth, he should say that and state for the record what his position on that issue is. Alternatively, he needs to explain how – if he was aware of this fact - he came to the conclusion that Obama was eligible to be on New Hampshire ballots. The issue of Obama’s British birth needs to be brought to the national table separate from the birth certificate issue. For anybody who was aware of Obama’s British birth admission, Pelosi’s certification could not have settled the issue of whether Obama was eligible since Pelosi and the DNC are not the United States Supreme Court which has never specifically addressed this question. But the Supreme Court has, in various cases, indicated that the native born son of an alien is not considered to be “natural born” even if he is a US citizen at birth. “Natural born” does not mean a person is a different type of citizen with different rights. Rather, it is a circumstance of birth required by the framers – as a national security measure – to be President and Commander In Chief.