Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (72044)	9/13/2009 11:01:14 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Why would Orly Taitz have a lawsuit of September if it is being based on what you posted from Wikipedia in early August. One caveat on Wikipedia, Wikipedia is as biased or nonbiased as those who write on it. So be sure to be skeptical of Wiki just as you are skeptical of other sources. You should delve a little further into the Hawaii certificate. Hawaii stopped issuing the original copies in the late 1990's----putting out a short form. The short form which was put out was said by some to be a photoshopped job. In any case, the short form, the computer document does not reflect the original copy. The original copy gives complete info-------that is the one that the State of Hawaii has sealed and refuses to let the public see. That leads back to Obama himself, he is keeping this original form out of sight------either as a political strategy or as it will raise further questions. Wiki calls the request for full disclosure a conspirarcy theory----------they are wrong-----this is Americans wanting to see the original copies without alterations. This was said to have come from Hillary's campaign----have you researched that?