Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (174588)	9/14/2009 11:35:48 AM
From: captkirk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 314006

pardon my ignorance, but how does someone 'find' an IP anomoly if it isn't there. someones data is wrong then, or they both used different systems, with different outputs? or ???? how can you make that kind of thing up? EC

To: E. Charters who wrote (174588)	9/14/2009 1:10:19 PM
From: ogi	1 Recommendation Respond to of 314006

I just looked at the Condor drill table PDF and yes in general lower grade and not the spectacular numbers highlighted by Goldmarca news. Your overviews of the gold corridor in the region are helpful and yes one cannot discount politics as after all we have been through to date we still don't know the law yet!!! I do not find it strange that EC's IP data is not on Kinross's site. You well know that if Kinross has the data they may not necessarily include it in their published work. EC has published their's and I think it is real. None of which means much and I am not betting they have anything just note they have the same rocks they have the same pathfinder elements and they have an ip anomaly, makes sense to drill it in my mind. They are proposing a 3 hole first pass, makes sense and their pitch has no elements of screaming Hyperbole about how they will be the next ARU a la the wonderful people at Lateegra I believe it was. Thanks for your thoughts Eric. Cheers, Ogi