Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (749)	10/30/1997 12:51:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Vaughn, I don't want to know anything about the women you date <grin>--but your exploration thinking is pretty sharp. You're right, 1 x-section explains nothing except "apparent" dip, to determine true dip requires another intersecting x-section of boreholes. Has Donner-Teck acquired any borehole-EM from DDH-67 or -75 or -70?? Borehole TEM, PEM or UTEM could possibly answer a bunch of questions about off-borehole massive mineralization and just where is the high grade may be trending. FYI, I credit Borehole UTEM for a few of the better later boreholes at DFR's Eastern Deeps. Regards, T.

To: VAUGHN who wrote (749)	10/30/1997 11:11:00 PM
From: Ed Pakstas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Vaughn. I never have professed to know a thing about geology or geophysics... I took that cross section at face value... I saw a pool (anomaly), getting larger and heading to the North East according to the diagram... I gotta let you know, that your are talking to someone who took a gold panning course in NW Alberta... That's about as far as it goes... When you guys get into the technical data regarding formations, anomaly's etc., etc., etc., it is so far beyond me (and I know that there has to be others), I can't even begin to comprehend the significance of what you are talking about...Never mind the significance, I having a hell of a time just trying to read and ponounce some of those words.. Dont' get me wrong, I do find it interesting, thought provoking and believe me when I tell you, it sure is nice to know that there are at least three posters on this thread that seem to know what they are talking about when it get's into the geology and geophysics aspects of this play... A special thanks to Terry Crebs, Feline and yourself... Please keep it going... regards... ed ps: You to, Chief With a combination like you guy's (and gal)...We should all be able to put a few sheckles in our pockets...

To: VAUGHN who wrote (749)	10/31/1997 12:38:00 AM
From: Ed Pakstas	Respond to of 11676

>>>Does the above hold water?<<< Yes it does... I can see and understand that it may not just be a cross section of a narrow channel which is widening to the NE...And I agree that according to the cross section, the anomaly may look something like (I'm trying to find the right description), lets say "half of a flying sauscer", and it most definitely can flow to the north or to the south... All I'm saying is that it appears to be thickening in the general direction of the MGJ property... Does that make sense to you?... And yes I do understand that by the time they are finished drilling the area... The whole place could look like the back of a porcupine... ...ed