Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (324251)	9/15/2009 1:43:48 AM
From: didjuneau	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793964

Can anyone explain this? nytimes.com Hoping to kick-start the legislation, Mr. Obama said: “I want them to hear my words. We will not go back to the days of reckless behavior and unchecked excess at the heart of this crisis, where too many were motivated only by the appetite for quick kills and bloated bonuses.” And how this doesn't apply to Fannie Mae? Or Congressional plans to "Rahm" it through? And yeah - it is hard to know what you're protesting against when the bills are 1500 pages and growing, and only doublespeak is used to explain them. Or this one: He also warned that “those on Wall Street cannot resume taking risks without regard for consequences, and expect that next time, American taxpayers will be there to break their fall.” And how we couldn't substitute "Congress" or "the Administration" for "those on Wall Street"?