Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (513778)	9/17/2009 2:59:27 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578926

So! that was not the point, the point is that you equated methane chlathrates as different than methane hydrate, then clamed you cannot have methane chlathrate in permafrost. You either are lacking in knowledge and BSing that you have knowledge, or you need to improve your communication skills. Sounds like you took a class with CJ. Including his inevitable 'So?' up front. Taro

To: HPilot who wrote (513778)	9/17/2009 7:21:21 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1578926

"So! that was not the point," It was the point. The point was detecting Arctic methane and differentiating it from methane from tropical regions. You decided to wander down this little garden path about chlathrates and why they weren't important. Which is a classical straw man argument. Since you got spanked on the original topic, you are now trying to move the goal posts and argue about something you know even less about. And doing it in a typical wingnut fashion of hand waving and throwing out half-understood concepts. "the point is that you equated methane chlathrates as different than methane hydrate" Which I never did. But, you are in so deep, what are a few lies?