SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (325101)9/19/2009 4:08:52 PM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 794396
 
No one but a nut case would mind it when the authorities step in to resolve family problems like this.

Since she seems to be on a mission.........how would Michelle have handled it?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Starved girl: Dad came 'to believe I was Satan'

By Steve Miletich

Seattle Times staff reporter

The tiny, teenage girl stepped to the front of the courtroom Friday, holding a letter she wanted to read to the judge about her father, who was about to be sentenced for failing to stop the girl's stepmother from systematically starving her.

Wearing a black skirt, layered sweaters and dark-rimmed glasses, the 15-year-old hesitated as she stood a few feet from her father, then broke into tears and walked from the podium. The judge, William Downing of King County Superior Court, assured her he had read the letter, which had been submitted to him in advance.

The girl, back in her seat, then watched as Downing sentenced her father, Jon Pomeroy, 43, to three years and five months in prison.

Hours later, the girl and her foster father released the two-page letter to The Seattle Times. In it, she told Downing she was deprived of a normal childhood because her father allowed himself to be manipulated by her stepmother, Rebecca Long.

"My whole point here is the fact I felt Rebecca was manipulating dad to believe I was Satan and that he wanted to believe it," the girl wrote. "That he would believe such a thing was the heartbreaking part to me."

Downing cited the length and severity of the girl's mistreatment in handing down a sentence at the top end of the sentencing range of 31 to 41 months. The judge noted that although Pomeroy had not physically abused his daughter, he failed in his duty as her father to protect her.

King County Deputy Prosecutor Zachary Wagnild had asked for the 41-month term, telling the court that Pomeroy stood by as his wife "quite literally tortured his daughter, year after year after year." He said the mistreatment began as early as 2005.

Pomeroy's attorney, Kevin Donnelly, of Seattle, sought a 31-month term, citing his client's remorse.

Pomeroy, who pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal mistreatment Aug. 31, choked on tears before receiving his sentence, saying he was "deeply sorry" for his actions.

"Nothing I say is going to change any of this," said Pomeroy, who was led away in handcuffs by courtroom guards at the conclusion of the hearing.

Pomeroy wrote in paperwork preceding his guilty plea that he knew Long was disciplining the girl by depriving her of food and water, but he opted not to intervene.

Long, 45, entered a modified guilty plea Sept. 4 to first-degree criminal mistreatment of her stepdaughter.

Long, who is awaiting sentencing set for Nov. 6, entered an Alford plea in which she did not admit guilt but acknowledged a jury would likely convict her if she were tried.

Prosecutors and police have said Pomeroy and Long isolated and starved the girl, who was 4 feet 7 and weighed just 48 pounds when authorities found her in August 2008 after they were called to the family's Carnation home to check on the girl at the request of Child Protective Services. The teen suffered dehydration so severe that her teeth were rotting, according to court documents.

The girl told detectives that she was so thirsty she would sometimes suck condensation from the windows or sneak a drink from the toilet, until she got caught. Then, she said, she was forced to sleep on the floor in her stepmom's room, a heavy dresser blocking the door.

The girl's brother, now 13, and two family dogs were found in good health.

In her Sept. 15 letter to Downing, the girl wrote that she "did not have a father who loved and cared for me."

As a young child, she wrote, she was expected to be an adult and make sure her brother didn't get into trouble.

If he misbehaved, she wrote, she would receive "harsh punishments" from Long, including spankings that would leave her sore for more than a week.

The girl wrote that she was pulled out of school in the fourth grade, supposedly to be home-schooled.

In reality, she wrote, she was helped with schoolwork for only a year. "Then I was told to work on my own, and voila no education at all."

Among other things, she told Downing, she did not have relationships with other children.

The girl recalled that her father said he would never let evil come to her, but then let Long "do her evil works."

"As time went by, I was constantly sleeping, always hungry, and then in the year of 2008, it was beginning to dawn on me that I might die in another year or so," she wrote. "That brought questions to my mind, 'what in the world is he going to do with my body when I die?!' "

On Friday, the girl and her brother sat in the courtroom with their foster parents, who live in King County. The brother sobbed after the hearing, burying his head against a court bench.

Their foster father, Dwight Thompson, 54, said the girl is attending high school, participating on the swim team and doing great.

"She's a vibrant and resilient young lady," he said.

She now weighs 98 pounds and is almost 5 feet tall, Thompson said.

Thompson said the girl couldn't read her letter to the judge because she was overcome with emotion.

"No matter how you cut it, your dad is your dad," he said. "It's hard to come to grips with what happened."

seattletimes.nwsource.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (325101)9/20/2009 10:49:58 AM
From: Brumar899 Recommendations  Respond to of 794396
 
The Obamacare horror story you won’t hear

By Michelle Malkin • June 19, 2009 01:04 AM

I blogged about Michelle Obama’s role in creating a patient-dumping scheme for the University of Chicago Medical Center back in March. With her husband and the Democrats unleashing health care horror story anecdotes to gin up public fear and build support for the beleaguered Obamacare plan, my syndicated column today revisits the kind of “reform” the Obamas and their Chicago cronies champion — and who benefits.

Here’s a challenge to the ABC News Obamacare infomercial producers. I dare you to ask President Obama this question: What have you done for Dontae Adams, lately?

***

The Obamacare horror story you won’t hear
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

The White House, Democrats, and MoveOn liberals are spreading health care sob stories to sell a government takeover. But there’s one health care policy nightmare you won’t hear the Obamas hyping. It’s a tale of poor, minority patient-dumping in Chicago — with First Lady Michelle Obama’s fingerprints all over it.

Both Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Democrat Rep. Bobby Rush of Chicago have raised red flags about the outsourcing program, run by the University of Chicago Medical Center. The hospital has non-profit status and receives lucrative tax breaks in exchange for providing charity care. Yet, it spent a measly $10 million on charity care for the poor in fiscal 2007 when Mrs. Obama was employed there—1.3 percent of its total hospital expenses, according to an analysis performed for The Washington Post by the non-partisan Center for Tax and Budget Accountability. The figure is below the 2.1 percent average for nonprofit hospitals in surrounding Cook County.

Rep. Rush called for a House investigation last week in response to months of patient-dumping complaints, noting: “Congress has a duty to expend its power to mitigate and prevent this despicable practice from continuing in centers that receive federal funds.”

Don’t expect the president to support a probe. While a top executive at the hospital, Mrs. Obama helped engineer the plan to offload low-income patients with non-urgent health needs. Under the Orwellian banner of an “Urban Health Initiative,” Mrs. Obama sold the scheme to outsource low-income care to other facilities as a way to “dramatically improve health care for thousands of South Side residents.” The program guaranteed “free” shuttle rides to and from the outside clinics.

In truth, it was old-fashioned cost-cutting and favor-trading repackaged as minority aid. Clearing out the poor freed up room for insured (i.e., more lucrative) patients. If a Republican had proposed the very same program and recruited black civic leaders to front it, Michelle Obama and her grievance-mongering friends would be screaming “RAAAAAAAAACISM!” at the top of their lungs.

Joe Stephens of the Washington Post wrote: “To ensure community support, Michelle Obama and others in late 2006 recommended that the hospital hire the firm of David Axelrod, who a few months later became the chief strategist for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Axelrod’s firm recommended an aggressive promotional effort modeled on a political campaign—appoint a campaign manager, conduct focus groups, target messages to specific constituencies, then recruit religious leaders and other third-party ‘validators.’ They, in turn, would write and submit opinion pieces to Chicago publications.”

Some health care experts saw through Mrs. Obama and her public relations man, David Axelrod—yes, the same David Axelrod who is now Mr. Obama’s senior adviser at the White House. The University of Chicago Medical Center hired Axelrod’s public relations firm, ASK Public Strategies, to promote Mrs. Obama’s Urban Health Initiative. Axelrod had the blessing of Chicago political guru Valerie Jarrett – now White House senior adviser.

Axelrod’s great contribution: Re-branding! His firm recommended re-naming the initiative after “nternal and external respondents expressed the opinion that the word ‘urban’ is code for ‘black’ or ‘black and poor’….Based on the research, consideration should be given to re-branding the initiative.” Axelrod and the Obama campaign refused to disclose how much his firm received for its genius re-branding services.

In February 2009, outrage in the Obamas’ community exploded after a young boy covered by Medicaid was turned away from the University of Chicago Medical Center. Dontae Adams’ mother, Angela, had sought emergency treatment for him after a pit bull tore off his upper lip. Mrs. Obama’s hospital gave the boy a tetanus shot, antibiotics, and Tylenol and shoved him out the door. The mother and son took an hour-long bus ride to another hospital for surgery.

I’ll guarantee you this: You’ll never see the Adams family featured at an Obama policy summit or seated next to the First Lady at a joint session of Congress to illustrate the failures of the health care system.

Following the Adams incident, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) blasted Mrs. Obama and Mr. Axelrod’s grand plan. The group released a statement expressing “grave concerns that the University of Chicago’s policy toward emergency patients is dangerously close to ‘patient dumping,’ a practice made illegal by the Emergency Medical Labor and Treatment Act (EMTALA)” – signed by President Reagan, by the way
– “and reflected an effort to ‘cherry pick’ wealthy patients over poor.”

Rewarding political cronies at the expense of the poor while posing as guardians of the downtrodden? Welcome to Obamacare.

michellemalkin.com