SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (9698)9/21/2009 7:24:17 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Watch TV infomercials... not fraud but people buy stupid stuff all day long.

True, and mostly stuff that doesn't need to be regulated away (except the existing laws and regulations against fraud, without which the situation would be worse)

health insurance costs in this country can equal or exceed what folks pay for housing or put into 401K's in their lifetime.

Certainly I've been putting a lot less in to it, but then I'm only middle aged (some would even consider that period to start later than my age, but I'm over half the average life expectancy), not old. I might over my life easily put over a half million (in today's dollars, more with inflation) in to such things, but then with expensive care when I get old, I might eventually face a similar level of expense, esp. if you consider expenses I don't directly pay (payouts that exceed my total insurance payments, or payouts that come out of tax money, and may exceed my life time Medicare tax payments).

So you are correct that health care and health insurance are potentially one of the largest lifetime costs people face.

But I don't see how we get from that fact to ideas like "there is a need for a very large government role", or "regulatory competition would be a bad idea".

In many ways less regulation DOES help. It allows people to pick insurance that fits their needs, rather than some politician's or political interest groups picture of their needs (assuming the politician or interest group is actually even trying to meet most people's needs, rather than just advancing their agenda regardless).



To: Road Walker who wrote (9698)9/21/2009 7:42:02 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 42652
 
Allowing the state with the lowest regulatory hurdles to dominate the market is not the way to get the best competition and serve the consumer.

The best way to run up prices in the health care (or any other) industry is to over-regulate it.

Not to mention that government regulation can be a disaster on its own (see the sub-prime mortgage crisis, caused by government insisting that lenders finance real estate for people who can't afford it).