Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (27225)	9/21/2009 11:41:10 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<YOU mentioned "criminals".> He constantly projects his beliefs on others and knowledge in general... ie. he thinks the meanings in HIS head are universal. dAK

To: Solon who wrote (27225)	9/22/2009 2:10:12 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

<<<Are you against criminals receiving Justice?>>> You do not want to answer this question do you? I'm going to keep asking it because it pertains directly to the issue of God's right to judge all malefactors, evildoers, transgressors, sinners, culprits, felons, crooks, hoodlums and gangsters on the basis of the Law. All of which are synonyms for criminal, BTW "Nothing in the passage indicates that his brothers were criminals. NOTHING WHATSOEVER." Apparently he (the rich, unjust man) knew his brothers better than you because he was sure they were headed for the same fate that he was. He was facing judgment for breaking the Law of Moses. That would make him a lawbreaker and a criminal. To claim that not listening to the Law is just a matter of innocent misunderstanding is a ridiculous and preposterous assertion. However it does illustrate something rather significant. That you would deny something that obvious from the context, goes to show that no matter how clear something is there is, it can be denied. That's why Abraham said to him: 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' " "You give false witness in the Luke passage to ordinary people as "criminals" but you agree with God that Noah and Lot were upright and perfect little ....." Such Moral outrage with a healthy dose of emotionalism. A very strange thing for someone who claims "My utterances are merely personal opinions" "My analogy wasn't about anybody hijacking a car? It was about people ignorant of the bridge being out being denied the ultimate proof--A DEAD PERSON RETURNING TO LIFE TO EDUCATE THEM." They had the sign and intentionally ignored it. They will get their "ultimate truth" when the car hits the rocks below, just like the sign said.