SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Binary Hodgepodge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3397)9/22/2009 11:12:59 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 6763
 
MaxiScale exits stealth, targets file storage for Web-scale apps

By 451 Group Analysts Simon Robinson, Henry Baltazar

Date: 21 Sep 2009

The last few months have seen a mini-glut of storage technologies that have been specifically designed to support Internet-scale workloads and applications. The latest startup to target this space is MaxiScale, which exits stealth mode this week with general availability of storage software it claims will change the economics of Web-scale infrastructure.

The 451 Take

With MaxiScale, cofounder Gianluca Rattazzi has returned to the file storage market for a third time, again looking to establish a company at the forefront of a growing trend. This time, that trend is cloud computing – even though the company isn't actively embracing this in its market, which could be a wise move should the delivery fail to match the initial expectation.

Context

MaxiScale was founded in 2007 by two serial Silicon Valley entrepreneurs. CEO Rattazzi has founded three companies that went on to become public – Meridian Data, Parallan Computer and P-Com – with a fourth – high-end NAS specialist BlueArc – currently waiting for conditions to improve before it re-files for IPO. Those with long memories will recall that Parallan actually acquired Meridian in 1995, adopted the name of its target and moved into what was the nascent NAS market before being acquired by Quantum in 1999. Cofounder Francesco Lacapra – CTO and VP of engineering at MaxiScale – worked with Rattazzi at Meridian and BlueArc, as well as other storage startups Attune Systems and Sanera.

The two cofounders are joined by VP of field operations Kevin O'Keefe and VP of marketing Gary Orenstein, who was a cofounder of pioneering IP storage specialist Nishan Systems. MaxiScale's headcount is currently 40, with the majority in engineering and 11 in sales and marketing. MaxiScale has raised $13.5m in venture funding from NEA, El Dorado Ventures, and Silicon Valley Bank.

Strategy

MaxiScale says its target market has entered the 'era of billions' as firms such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, AdMob and Apple's iPhone app store are now handling such numbers of files, streams, views and downloads as a matter of course.

As with other players in this space, MaxiScale has concluded that a fresh approach is required in order to deliver a commercial-grade storage platform that can handle such workloads. MaxiScale was formed with the specific purpose of developing a storage platform capable of handling the scale, performance and cost requirements of Web-based applications hosted at Internet datacenters. Although it's deliberately not marketing itself as a cloud-enabling technology – the term is already too loaded, it notes – it is effectively targeting cloud-scale applications, particularly those that rely on massive amounts of unstructured data.

Although social media websites such as those mentioned above are the poster children of the Web 2.0 age, MaxiScale believes that its target market is large and growing. Ripe targets also include hosted IT services, e-commerce, content-delivery networks and any large enterprise with substantial Web-facing operations.

Products

MaxiScale's FLEX software platform has been designed solely for such environments. Although it provides all of the essential requirements of any credible storage platform – capacity, performance and reliability – the company has eschewed traditional technologies in each of these areas in favor of new approaches. This, it claims, not only allows FLEX to deliver new levels of scale, but also at a cost – in terms of operational overhead and actual unit cost – that traditional approaches can't touch. Unlike other newer storage technologies targeting cloud-like environments, MaxiScale says FLEX is also capable of handling a diverse set of workloads.

FLEX is a software building block that can be married with commodity hardware to build a 'scale out' distributed storage platform for file serving. A key design point was to build a high-performance system using 1TB or 2TB SATA drives and low-cost IP (Gigabit Ethernet) connectivity. MaxiScale says its system is capable of scaling to 50,000 nodes, with hundreds of petabytes in a single global namespace.

With regards to pricing, it is offering a minimum software configuration for four nodes at $6,000 (up to 32TB). It's not providing the hardware itself, but says a typical node can be a 1U quad-core server with 8TB of SATA storage and 8GB or 16GB of memory, currently priced at around $2,500. Additional modules, such as for small-file optimization, are priced separately.

Technology

One of the big differences between FLEX and a traditional storage system is that FLEX doesn't use RAID for data reliability. As with others targeting this space, it has concluded that the bit-error rate of RAID with very large drives makes it impractical at this scale because of the risk of an error during a rebuild.

Instead, MaxiScale combines a concept it calls 'peer sets' with replication (via multicast) to achieve protection. A peer set essentially is a mini-cluster, spanning a group of two or three drives on distinct nodes. Data redundancy – at both the drive and node levels – is achieved by replicating data to all members of the peer set. MaxiScale adds that peer sets rebuild data at the file level, rather than having to rebuild the entire raw drive, reducing the time it takes to rebuild a drive. It says that this approach also means that drive upgrades can be performed nondisruptively with drives in place. Additionally, MaxiScale says peer sets avoid some of the performance limitations of other clustered file systems, such as bottlenecks caused by using a distributed lock manager, a centralized metadata server (especially with small files) and excessive node-to-node communication.

By contrast, FLEX employs techniques such as distributed metadata across all nodes, which reduces bottlenecks by load balancing concurrent requests across the cluster. Also, the ability to isolate peer sets within a larger cluster reduces the amount of internode communication, which MaxiScale says removes another performance bottleneck.

Access to FLEX will be provided through MaxiScale's POSIX-compliant file-serving engine, which allows for simplified integration without forcing customers to reconfigure applications to a proprietary API; MaxiScale claims that makes it especially attractive for prospects looking to integrate with new and legacy Internet applications with a minimum of fuss. FLEX actually stores content in three different repositories, depending on data size and type. For standard file content, FLEX maintains both a 'normal file repository' and a 'small file repository' and seamlessly writes files under 1MB in size to the latter. Within the small-file repository, FLEX ensures that the blocks required to retrieve a small file – which are held in 1KB chunks – are written sequentially to guarantee that any file held there can be accessed with a single I/O operation. For database and peer-to-peer content, FLEX also provides a key-value object store, which gives customers the option of using application- or system-generated keys to identify content.

MaxiScale is also working on a 'phase 2' that will allow custom applications to be deployed on top of FLEX. It's initially working on support for large-scale MapReduce analytics applications such as Hadoop and for data warehousing.

Competition

As the size of the potential cloud opportunity continues to grow, storage vendors are increasingly looking to get in on the act. MaxiScale positions itself in a new category of 'distributed storage' for Internet-scale unstructured data. It claims more scalability than traditional clustered NAS systems (e.g., Ibrix/HP, Isilon Systems, NetApp OnTap GX and IBM GPFS) while offering a 'full solution' approach in contrast to the DIY path taken by large Internet players such as Yahoo! (with its MObStor scalable storage platform), Facebook (with Haystack), Amazon S3 and the big daddy of them all: the Google File System. With regards to the latter, MaxiScale notes that the pending GFS 2 is embracing some of the techniques it has incorporated into FLEX, such as distributed metadata and a reduced chunk size (down to 1MB.)

There are other vendors targeting the same market as MaxiScale, however, including EMC's Atmos and DataDirect Networks' Web Object Scalar. MaxiScale says both approaches force customers to buy each vendor's own hardware (reducing flexibility as well as elevating cost, it claims) while forcing customers to customize their applications in order to connect to the system. MaxiScale believes that while this may appeal to developers working on new apps, it's a significant turnoff for customers hoping to connect legacy apps to cloud storage. Software-centric players, including Bycast, ParaScale and Caringo, are circling the same kind of opportunity.

SWOT analysis

Strengths
As track records go, that of MaxiScale's founders is pretty hard to beat: taking three companies public, with the fourth's attempt (BlueArc) dashed only by the melting of the financial markets.

Weaknesses
MaxiScale faces the challenge of any company looking to establish a brand new product in an emerging market. An exclusive focus on the Internet-scale apps leaves it with few places to hide.

Opportunities
As we have noted extensively in the past, the storage challenges faced by an ever growing list of Internet players and many large enterprises are not diminishing. The cloud offers an answer.

Threats
Hyperbole around cloud computing continues to build, with a growing number of larger vendors increasingly viewing it as a strategic focus area. A rising tide lifts all boats of course, but MaxiScale may need some help in bringing its message to the wider market.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3397)9/22/2009 4:06:29 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 6763
 
This was cut from The Temptations Live in Concert, performing "My Girl" and "Just my Imagination"...

youtube.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3397)9/23/2009 9:20:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 6763
 
University of Illinois President to Step Down After Scandal
_______________________________________________________________

By EMMA GRAVES FITZSIMMONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES
September 23, 2009

CHICAGO — The president of the University of Illinois announced Wednesday that he would resign, after a scandal over admissions practices that has for months enveloped the state’s premier public university.

The president, B. Joseph White, had been under growing pressure to take responsibility for his role in the scandal, in which, according to an independent state commission, the university gave admissions preference to unqualified applicants who were the children of the wealthy and well-connected.

A majority of the members of the university’s board resigned after the commission released a scathing report in August. And this month, the university’s Faculty Senate approved a resolution supporting the removal of Mr. White and of Richard Herman, the chancellor of the best-known of the university’s three campuses, in Urbana-Champaign.

In the past, Mr. White, 62, has denied that he pressured anyone to admit particular students, although the commission cited at least one situation in which he conveyed to another university official the wishes of Rod R. Blagojevich, who was then the governor, that two applicants be admitted. In his letter of resignation, Mr. White said he was stepping down “to enable you as a newly constituted board to select university leadership going forward.”

Christopher G. Kennedy, a prominent businessman here who has been made chairman of the board, said Mr. White’s resignation would prevent a “complicated discussion about termination.”

“The president left on his own accord,” Mr. Kennedy said in an interview. “There wasn’t a fight.”

On Wednesday, Gov. Patrick J. Quinn praised Mr. White for his decision, saying it was a “courageous act” that would help the university move forward.

Mr. White will serve as president until the end of the year, then stay on to teach and raise money, officials said. The board will appoint an interim president while conducting a search for a new one.

Mr. White, who became president of the university in 2005, was the dean of the business school at the University of Michigan for a decade. A native of Detroit, he has a doctorate in business administration from the University of Michigan.

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
_______________

A Bully in the Pulpit: The Tribune Hammers the University of Illinois to Submission

cdobs.com

Editorial
By John Powers
23 September 2009

The Tribune has been obsessed for several months now over the admissions process at the University of Illinois, the flagship public university in the State of Illinois system. As the Tribune had it, students using political clout were being provided with preferential admission to the competitive U of I system. The Tribune editorial board demanded the University Trustees and President resign for participating in preferrential admission procedure. Most of the Trustees resigned a few weeks ago. Today, the Tribune got it’s wish: University of Illinois President Joseph White has resigned.

I added up over 100,000 words in the Tribune a few weeks ago devoted to this subject. Which begs the question…is preferential admission really a problem? Most every private university has some non-quantitative method of admissions. Letters from an alumni, recommendations from clergy, and yes recommendations from politicians are routinely used at colleges and universities all over the United States. Gasp! West Point requires a political recommendation for admission.

Oh, and most public graduate and doctoral schools require some sort of recommendation letters for admission. In many states, a letter from the Governor is considered a good thing, adding some credibility to an applicants status.

Given that the Tribune has not only refused to cover many simple cases of political corruption (Robert Creamer anyone?) in the State of Illinois, they have also participated in skulduggery aimed at Blair Hull, Jack Ryan, and anyone else who does not fit the Tribunes narrative, perhaps some discretion would have been advised in this case. The State of Illinois has plenty of corruption to go around without making up a scandal where not much of one exists.

Take a look at some numbers. Out of 120,000 student applications, 800 (.6%) were set aside for additional consideration, CLOUTED, per the breathless newspaper. Fifty percent of the clouted applicants were accepted, vs. 40% of all waitlisted applicants being eventually accepted. An average of 12 students (out of 42,000, or .02%) per year over the last 5 years were accepted who would not otherwise gain admittance to the U of I.

Maybe the practice of recommending students for special consideration is flawed. Many universities and almost all graduate programs would disagree. On the other hand, maybe the public wants the University of Illinois to be managed by the Press rather than our elected officials and trustees, which given the state of our political class is a distinct possibility.

I’ll toss out the fact that President White introduced a distance learning program that was extremely unpopular with faculty and alumni. It has been suspended. As an alum, I thought the distance learning program was a ill-formed idea myself. But as bad as it may have been, I certainly don’t think that University Governance should be fundamentally changed based on the ramblings of the Chicago Tribune. The Univeristy of Illinois is in sound condition today, as it has been during President White’s tenure. Ask yourself, do you really want the editorial board at the Tribune running one of the country’s premier research universities?

**
John Powers is the President of the Chicago Daily Observer



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3397)9/25/2009 2:44:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 6763
 
GP Profile: GTCR Golder Rauner Tees Up The Deals

buyoutsnews.com

By Bernard Vaughan
BuyoutsNews
17 August, 2009

GTCR Golder Rauner, the Chicago buyout shop, is prepping to ramp up its signature consolidation strategy, having created four new platforms this year alone. The pressure now is on to complete acquisitions for these shell companies with little help from a frail financing market.

It is a challenge embraced by GTCR executives, who employ a growth equity-buyout hybrid strategy that leaves them room to do all-equity transactions but that, in some respects, is riskier than a traditional buyout strategy.

Among the new platforms that GTCR, about halfway through investing its vintage 2006 ninth fund of $2.7 billion, has created this year are Actient Pharmaceuticals LLC, a Deerfield, Ill.-based company to which the firm in March committed up to $200 million to buy specialty pharmaceutical companies and products. Others include Six3 Systems Inc., a company GTCR helped form in June to buy up businesses in the national security and defense intelligence industries, and which has already agreed to acquire Harding Security Associates Inc., and ReSurge Ltd, a company to which the firm committed $150 million in June to buy, sell and lease libraries of three-dimensional seismic data that energy companies use to explore for oil. Last month the firm also announced it was backing Palladium Financial Holdings, a company created to buy businesses that deal with consumer credit, payments and rewards programs, to the tune of $200 million.

Aside from its traditional consolidations, the firm this June also took a minority stake in Ironshore Inc. leading a $300 million investment in the Bermuda-based property casualty insurance company.

Meantime, GTCR completed two add-on acquisitions this year. In April, Boomerang Media, which buys entertainment copyrights, bought the principal U.K. and U.S. trading subsidiaries of Entertainment Rights, a company that owns the rights to such franchises as Casper the Friendly Ghost and The Lone Ranger. And last month Graceway Pharmaceuticals purchased the commercial rights of three compounds that treat oily skin and acne from Pfizer.

GTCR also logged a successful exit this year, selling OVATION Pharmaceuticals in March for a 6x return on its equity after a seven-year holding period.

It's all part of the firm's effort to build on a track record that's been remarkably consistent over the years. The firm's fourth fund, vintage 1993, and fifth fund, vintage 1996, generated IRRs of 24.94 percent and 11.34 percent, respectively, as of Sept. 30, 2008 for the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, which doesn’t provide investment multiples. Fund VII, vintage 2000, has generated a 23.4 percent IRR and investment multiple of 2.34x for backer Washington State Investment Board as of Dec. 31, 2008, while Fund VIII, vintage 2003, has generated a 32.8 percent IRR and returned 1.76x invested capital. The firm’s gross IRR since its inception is 35.7 percent, according to David Donnini, a GTCR principal.

The Strategy

GTCR's bread-and-butter strategy centers on consolidation.

After researching a fast-growing sector for anywhere from two to six years, GTCR teams up with an executive—one it has worked with before, more often than not—to create a platform shell company to go out and buy companies in that industry. Over the last decade, 70 percent of the firm’s investments involved follow-on acquisitions.

The firm’s specialty sectors include business services and outsourcing, consumer products, financial services, health care, technology, and transaction processing. Executives especially favor industries that they feel are difficult to understand. “We want our partners to truly be insiders in domains they’re responsible for,” said Phil Canfield, a principal at GTCR. “When you’re getting calls from guys running businesses, you find yourself in a position to see opportunities long before they’re being written about in industry trade rags.”

GTCR’s pre-investment research, while time consuming, often pays off when it comes to auctions. James Schroder, a partner at investment bank Arma Partners, said Canfield and Vice President Mark Anderson were the only bidders on Sorenson Communications to notice that the company was carrying at full cost certain expenses that could be claimed as capital expenses on its balance sheet. This allowed GTCR to see more profit potential and to place a higher value on the Salt Lake City-based provider of communication services for the deaf community, which it bought in November 2005.

“If I have a very good deal that I think could be a great opportunity, they’ll absolutely see it,” said Schroder, who also advised IQNavigator in its June 2008 sale to GTCR. “If they see something they like they will just go after it, and it generally turns out to be a win-win for both parties.”

John Morris, a managing director at fund-of-funds manager HarbourVest Partners, pointed out the firm's habit of starting platforms from scratch in fast-growing markets and observed, “They’re really a bit of a hybrid between venture capital and buyouts.”

Indeed, there appears to be an element of venture-like risk and return to the strategy. Rather than a single established company, GTCR is essentially placing its bets on industry trends, which sometimes don’t evolve according to plans. One banker told Buyouts that his firm, which has on occasion lost money financing GTCR deals, is especially cautious when evaluating the shop's deals. “They have on the aggregate very strong returns, but they tend to have some volatility,” said the banker. “They feel they find the best in breed with management and they have no problem being fairly aggressive with what they take on with that manager.”

That said, GTCR's Canfield believes that growth investing, if done right, isn’t any more riskier than straight buyout investing. He noted that most losses occurring in the private equity industry today concern traditional buyouts weighed down with debt. Canfield estimated that GTCR achieves its goal of making 2.5x on each investment more than two-thirds of the time. “In the current environment, I can’t think of another private equity portfolio that’s performing as well ours,” he said.

According to Donnini, revenue and net profit at GTCR’s 25 portfolio companies rose, in the aggregate, about 10 percent in the fourth quarter, in the heart of the recession. Bruce Rauner, chairman, told delegates at the Buyouts Chicago conference in June that four or five portfolio companies were “really struggling,” with earnings and revenues down and possibly facing restructuring, according to the Chicago Tribune. At least one company, food decoration equipment maker Wilton Products Inc, has been publicly flirting with bankruptcy.

Executives point out that they were able to return much more money than they invested during the buyout boom years. From 2004 through 2007, the firm invested $2.5 billion while returning 3x that amount—$7.5 billion—to its investors. This, executives said, translates to a smaller, relatively healthy portfolio. “We’re a lot less bogged down than our peers with large portfolios, and I think that frees us up to think creatively and think more about investing,” said Craig Bondy, a GTCR principal.

Executives at GTCR are currently scouting deals in health care services, managed care, pharmaceuticals and medical products; as well as in seismic information for energy companies; national security and defense intelligence; technology and information services; and credit card processing.

Fresh underwriting of new capital structures is still rare, but the firm sees plenty of opportunities that don’t require new capital structures or where they can employ reasonable amounts of senior and mezzanine debt. Executives are also seeking deals where they can re-structure existing financing agreements. For example, when Boomerang Media in April bought the U.K. and U.S. trading subsidiaries of Entertainment Rights, GTCR arranged for the company’s existing lender, Lloyds TSB, to finance 50 percent of the $99 million purchase price.

GTCR also sees opportunities to invest in companies it previously looked at but passed on because the prices were too high, and good businesses that need capital to fund acquisitions or de-leverage. The firm plans to raise a 10th fund in mid to late-2010. “Our view is that right now is a much better time to be a buyer than a seller,” Canfield said.

By Bernard Vaughan
Snapshot
Firm: GTCR Golder Rauner

Headquarters: Chicago

History: Founded as Golder Thoma & Co. by Carl Thoma and the late Stanley Golder in 1980. Became Golder Thoma & Cressey in 1984 with the addition of Bryan Cressey, and, with the elevation of Bruce Rauner to partner it became Golder Thoma Cressey Rauner. In 1998, Cressey and Thoma split to start Thoma Cressey Equity Partners, and Golder and Rauner started GTCR Golder Rauner.

Strategy: Buyouts and buy-and-build in sectors such as business services and outsourcing, consumer products, financial services, health care, technology, and transaction processing. Typically invests between $30 million and $250 million per transaction.

Number of Investment Pros: 41

Key Professionals: Bruce Rauner, chairman (transitioning to an advisory role in next fund); and Principals Craig Bondy, Phil Canfield, David Donnini, Joe Nolan and Collin Roche.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3397)9/25/2009 8:13:00 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6763
 
Intuit mints a rich deal
_______________________________________________________________

451 Group Analysts: Thomas Rasmussen, Brenon Daly

18 Sep 2009 -- We might be inclined to read Intuit's recent purchase of Mint Software as a case of 'If you can't beat 'em, buy 'em.' The acquisition by the powerhouse of personal finance software undoubtedly gives the three-year-old startup a premium valuation. Intuit will hand over $170m in cash for Mint, which we understand was running at less than $10m in revenue. (Although we should add that Mint had only just begun looking for ways to make money from its growing 1.5-million user base.)

More than revenue, we suspect this deal was driven by Intuit's desire to get into a new market, online money management and budgeting, as well as the fear of the prospects of a smaller but rapidly growing competitor. (Intuit and Mint have been talking for most of this year, according to one source.) In that way, Intuit's latest acquisition has some distinct echoes of its previous buy, that of online payroll service PayCycle. For starters, the purchase price of both PayCycle and Mint totaled $170m. And even more unusually, bulge bracket biggie Goldman Sachs advised Intuit on both of these summertime deals. (Remember the days when major banks would hardly answer the phone for any transaction valued at less than a half-billion dollars? How times change.) On the other side of the table in this week's deal, Credit Suisse's Colin Lang advised Mint.