SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (9754)9/22/2009 4:53:12 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 42652
 
The Effects of Two Specified Policy Options for Health Care on the Federal Budget Deficit

Yesterday CBO released a letter responding to questions from the Ranking Member of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Budget about how two policy options for health care would affect the budget deficit over the long term. One option would replace the current tax exclusion for premiums for employment-based health insurance with a tax credit that would grow over time at a rate less than that of health care inflation. The other option would convert Medicaid into a defined-contribution program with federal outlays increasing over time at a rate less than that of health care inflation. In CBO’s view, both options would reduce future budget deficits, relative to projections under current law, by amounts that increased over time. The analysis presented in the letter covers only these two general policy concepts and does not represent an analysis of any particular legislation.



To: Lane3 who wrote (9754)9/23/2009 9:55:33 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Distribution and delegation are tried and true paradigms.

Yeah deregulation worked great for the banks.