Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (515486)	9/23/2009 10:55:19 AM
From: Peter Dierks	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578105

Your patience with the less rational continues to amaze me.

To: one_less who wrote (515486)	9/23/2009 2:00:05 PM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1578105

Nice work.....as CJ retreats with his tail between his legs (again).

To: one_less who wrote (515486)	9/24/2009 12:34:08 PM
From: combjelly	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578105

"Non Sequitor" What non sequitur? You are the one delving into epistemology, not I. Because that is what this statement is. "Facts are absolutes and do not change, which only exist in the ideological sense and are not materialistically testable." "You'd be throwing in the towel at this point then... okeedoke" What towel has been thrown in? All you have done is thrown together some loosely connected sentences that you probably don't understand. And you still haven't addressed that I have pointed out that you are FOS with your claims about 'facts'. You start off your pile o'nonsense with a meaningless 'definition' of the scientific process. Lots of big, impressive words that really didn't say anything. You then segue into a pile of crap about 'facts' that is total nonsense and has nothing to do with science or the process. In other words, you tried to sound like you were being knowledgeable, but didn't succeed. What little you actually said was just nonsense dressed up in fancy sounding words. And you still haven't managed to address the issue.