To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (515696 ) 9/23/2009 4:36:52 PM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576238 Democrats are the party of extreme situational politics on national security. Almost every major Democrat with presidential aspirations voted to authorize the Iraq War, then turned on it. As the Iraq War spiraled downward, many Democrats called for more troops, then resisted the surge. It has practically been mandatory for all good, card-carrying Democrats to trumpet the centrality of the Afghan War since 2003 , using it as a rhetorical club to attack President Bush’s focus on Iraq. Now that it is crunch time in Afghanistan, they’ve gone from resolute to flaccid. ..... In August, he told the Veterans of Foreign Wars that Afghanistan is “a war of necessity,” because “if left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans.” In March, he announced “a comprehensive new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan.” He called for reversing the Taliban’s gains by taking the fight to the insurgents , training the Afghan security forces and promoting a better Afghan government. .......article.nationalreview.com Here are verbatim quotes from the President’s strategy speech quoted by the Council for Foreign Relations in March 2009. “Good morning. Today, I am announcing a comprehensive, new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan. This marks the conclusion of a careful policy review that I ordered as soon as I took office. ….... America must no longer deny resources to Afghanistan because of the war in Iraq. …There is an uncompromising core of the Taliban. They must be met with force, and they must be defeated. .....pajamasmedia.com