SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg or e who wrote (27285)9/23/2009 8:14:20 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
"What? I'm supposed to prove to you that Jesus is not the most evil person to ever walk the earth."

You are supposed to apply the same "justice" to the fictitious "Jesus" as you applied to the fictitious person in Luke. There was only the most fragile circumstantial evidence that the rich fellow in the parable did not murder any adulteresses. There is explicit evidence that the fictional Jesus did not murder them and was thus a "criminal" by your lights.

What would Abraham say to Jesus for breaking the Law of Moses?? Would he still favor the filthy and worthless vagabond, Lazarus whom he was holding to his bosom??



To: Greg or e who wrote (27285)9/23/2009 9:08:36 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
"I'm supposed to prove to you that Jesus is not the most evil person to ever walk the earth."

Just tell me why you condemn the rich man for an unproven and minor matter while you say nothing against Jesus violating the LAWS OF GOD??

Instead of murdering the adulteress (who did nothing wrong) Jesus told her to stop having sex with that guy.

Jesus (God) could have told the rich man to keep a better eye on his gateway, eh????

What are you fella--STUPID?????