SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (105456)9/27/2009 1:41:33 PM
From: CalculatedRisk10 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Yes, I've talked with scientists working in the field (including a Nobel Laureate) and I think I have a fairly strong understanding of science (I have an undergraduate degree in Chemistry).

All good scientists have doubt, and if you are asking for 100% proof - you'll be disappointed.

This is a complicated issue, and some people will keep the discussion going forever with little tidbits of information - and I see no need for me to spend my time trying to convince people on this issue.

I've moved on to the solution phase. Sorry you were left behind. The evidence is overwhelming, just spend some time with google.

best wishes.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (105456)9/27/2009 6:49:44 PM
From: GST7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
<GST proclamations about the earth not cooling of late are completely false> Bullroar. Climate change science is not the weather channel and nobody is making day to day predictions about temperatures -- you seem to have no idea of the level of complexity or time scale involved in the discussion. That does put you in the Beck camp, whether you know it or not. You think you are going to decode the science of climate on an SI chat line? That is about as realistic as trying to construct a nuclear weapon using only a piece of paper and a ball of string.