Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (516900)	9/29/2009 8:28:11 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578092

But all DNA is not encoded......in humans only about 1.5% is.. I wonder what you're trying to say here. Do you mean that all DNA is is "not coding"? That doesn't change the fact that DNA does contain encoded information and in fact its primary purpose is to store encoded information. Its only part of an information encoding system (with a symbolic language, ribosomes, and other features). Further the "non-coding" sections of DNA do have purposes (gene regulation) which aren't yet well understood. In fact there's believed to be another as yet untranslated language. For a long time, evolutionists proclaimed "non-coding" DNA was junk left over from evolution. An example of evolutionary theory acting temporarily as a science stopper. A vegetable, e.g. an onion, has very much more DNA than man....any idea why?? No. And I'm not sure I'd believe it based on your claim. Its not important and has nothing to do with the issue of how the information and information encoding system in living things originated.