SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (517548)10/1/2009 9:09:06 AM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1579025
 
This is bizarre.......a teacher brings out a cut out of GW Bush and puts in front of the flag and then the kids start saluting and shouting out to the cutout. Then the teacher starts speaking in some strange language. It must be some Christian school. Very weird.

Hey, Beck. You want indoctrination?

by Jed Lewison

Wed Sep 30, 2009 at 04:30:05 PM PDT

Well, here ya' go:

[see video clip]

Now, do us a favor, and keep your rants raging, because with every rung of the ladder you climb, you're taking the Good Ship G.O.P. down another notch.

dailykos.com



To: Alighieri who wrote (517548)10/1/2009 9:40:44 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579025
 
What a bogus, manipulated graph. It doesn't even chart revenue (you're looking at revenue vs. gdp).

Here is a MEANINGFUL graph, where you can clearly see the income tax revenue, not a figure that is designed to provide a particular image.



Because of the scale, it is a little difficult to see the benefits of the JFK cuts -- however, if you look at a graph that is scaled appropriately for the period it is evident.

But the Reagan tax cuts caused a surge in income tax revenue that lasted into the 90s. And in fact, the Clinton tax increases early in his term could not offset the increased revenue that began under Reagan (although, econometric analysis has shown that those increases DID negatively impact growth and therefore tax revenue).

But the sharp increase in revenue at the end of the 90s is a direct result of Clinton's tax cuts and the resultant surge in growth.

Later, the first round of Bush tax cuts, which weren't appropriately targeted, could not offset the collapse of the dot-com bubble, but when the REAL Bush tax cuts came along, look what happened.

It is unmistakable. Unless you cook up a bogus graph like you did which isn't even tax revenue and doesn't break out the income tax revenue from the PR tax revenue.