SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (9575)10/3/2009 9:11:59 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24213
 
The Short Tail: Near-Sourcing Trends Create New Winners and Losers in the Supply Chain
By Benjamin Gordon, Special Contributor -- Supply Chain Management Review, 10/1/2009 7:26:00 AM
The move toward “near-sourcing” is underway. Car manufacturer Tesla Motors just canceled plans to manufacture its 1,000 pound batteries in Thailand as previously planned. By manufacturing them closer to Tesla’s home base in California, it will decrease the shipping distance of each battery approximately 5,000 miles. Other major manufacturers are following suit.

Also called “reverse globalization” or “shortening the supply chain,” near-sourcing describes the return of American manufacturing in order to decrease shipping expenses. As freight costs remain high, globalization has become less competitive and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We will share why near-sourcing is happening, discuss implications for the supply chain industry, and conclude by offering ideas to supply chain business owners to ensure their success amidst change.

Near-Sourcing: Requiem for Globalization?
Historically, cheap gas fueled globalization. It enabled companies from all over the world to shop globally for cost-saving business solutions. However, fuel costs have nearly doubled since January of 2006, and have shot up by nearly six times in the past six years (see “Chart One”). In a recent CIBC World Markets Report, analyst Jeff Rubin estimates that the cost of transporting imported goods into the United States is now equivalent to a 9 percent tariff on imports. Companies will recalculate the costs and benefits of global outsourcing as the cost of energy is expected to remain high indefinitely.
scmr.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (9575)10/3/2009 12:49:53 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Respond to of 24213
 
The author of this article makes a very interesting case for taking US jobs to China and other countries with a smaller carbon footprint than that of the US. Seems to me that it jives with Bush's view for taking jobs overseas.

chinadaily.com.cn