SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 99 RS stocks--WATCH THEM FLY HIGHER AND HIGHER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: freelyhovering who wrote (293)10/30/1997 7:17:00 PM
From: Howard Wong  Respond to of 836
 
Great intraday chart

iqc.com

-gh



To: freelyhovering who wrote (293)10/30/1997 10:44:00 PM
From: HeyRainier  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 836
 
[ RS 99/RS 87 Stocks ] I briefly saw somewhere a scan performed for stocks with a Relative Strength of 87. As I have only minimally contributed to this thread, I do not know if the following information has already been repeated:

William O' Neil, in his interview with Jack Schwager in Market Wizards, notes that of his CANSLIM technique, particularly the L(for leader/laggard) part, he mentioned that the 500 best performing stocks during the 1953-1985 period had an average relative strength of 87 before their major price increase actually began.

While I would not want to divert the direction of the thread from its main purpose, it would seem prudent, given the existing information, to search for those stocks that achieve the RS 87 threshold, as historical evidence presents these particular stocks to be the ones that have provided the greatest returns on one's speculation(as opposed to investment, which could also be the case).

I think, therefore, that the question of whether it is too late to buy the RS 99 stocks is too late has been raised, and for good reason. That leads to the next question:

On average, approximately how long does an RS 99 stay within that category, and for the given time period, what is the average percentage change for that period?

There's a lot of fascinating research that needs to be done, and I'm glad your thread has provided a platform from which to ask these questions.

Regards,

Rainier



To: freelyhovering who wrote (293)10/31/1997 12:43:00 PM
From: John Langston  Respond to of 836
 
Myron: Interesting thread you have here. I use RS of 99 as one of two primary criteria for short candidates. With the group you have here, you should be able to find the other ingredients very soon.

John Langston