Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (20366)	10/5/2009 6:52:54 AM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Yes, Iran will find themselves bound by their word and you know they will be honorable! LOL It is much like Sarkozy spoke of Obama. We have to live in the present and presently we have nuclear threats in North Korea and Iran. We aren't living in a virtual world. I think Sarkozy hit the nail on the head. There are those on the left who are very naive who believe rogue states and those who want to see nuclear proliferation in unstable countries. What a wonderful group!

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (20366)	10/5/2009 10:22:41 AM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

You have ignored the question... so let's try again, " ' do you HONESTLY believe Iran's intentions are peaceful and they have no intentions of develop nukes? Yes or No?' " As an Islamic sympathizer, I can see why you would think phony compliance should be hailed as a giant-step forward. Unfortunately, Iran's signature on a document would be a joke in poor taste – as valueless as any other militant, Islamic nation's signature to any agreement. We both know it would be nothing beyond an insincere delaying tactic, as sanctioned by the Koran, used to gain advantage.