Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (27527)	10/7/2009 2:14:35 PM
From: Steve Felix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

So sorry I misspelled. I think I have it now. The creator doesn't need a creator because he wasn't created. He just always was. And this is what I said: Nonsense is impossible to argue with.

To: Greg or e who wrote (27527)	10/7/2009 3:50:35 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<((Everything which has a beginning has a cause. The universe had a beginning. Therefore the universe has a cause.))> Actually, everything occurs when conditions are correct. One could argue NOTHING has "a" cause. But we went throught this before with "context"... you whimped out. <You may wish to challenge either of the premises, but not the logic. Go for it. > Guy, we've "gone for" numberous topics... let's stop and list the 'challenges' you cant seem to respond to in the past: 1.) Evolution, that there is no such a thing. 2.) God as a person; the meaning of such. 3.) That Lao Tzu is incorrect and you know that there are no 'real people' and of course by definition WHAT that means. 4.) You know the definition of Christian (since it's been standardized for the past 1000 years). Get your glue bong out and GO BABY GO! Or just skip all your other claims as hazy hungover rants and move right on to claim that everything has "a cause". DAK