SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (20560)10/7/2009 4:52:58 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
What good is an overwhelming advantage over a country with fewer weapons if they first takeout a major city? How does that make them less of a threat unless you think sacrificing a city to suicidal nut cases is a great idea?

If someone has a gun with one bullet is he less a threat to you because you have a thousand bullets?

You make no sense. I claimed you made stupid remarks the other day. I repeat my conclusion. You make stupid statements.

You claimed Iran wouldn't be a threat if they had a nuclear weapon because we had 900.

If you cannot see the error in your convoluted thoughts, I cannot be responsible for you feeling that I or any other poster is responding to you in a short manner. Your rhetoric actually deserves less.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (20560)10/8/2009 9:09:37 AM
From: Cage Rattler1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
"Actually, the inability to quickly conquer Iraq and Afghanistan is debilitating our status, not increasing it."

I agree. IMHO, such is one unfortunate consequence of America's national division and the inadvertent "leveling of the playing field" by not waging the war to win.

What would General Schwartzkopf have done?