SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (74767)10/8/2009 1:16:14 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 90947
 
Pollsters push people to accept Obamacare

By William Tate
American Thinker

Gallup has unintentionally revealed how they, and other polling organizations, have been pushing the public to accept Obamacare.

The revelation came in a report late last month which revealed that a significant majority of Americans believes that individuals themselves, and not the government, should be responsible for ensuring they have health insurance. According to Gallup, 61% of folks they surveyed believe that health insurance should be left to the individual, not the nanny state. Unsurprisingly, 89% of Republicans held that view, but so did 64% of independents. Only Democrats, at 62%, wanted Big Brother to shoulder the responsibility.

Even though the survey was released on September 30, not too many folks have seen these numbers. As they do with most anti-Obamacare news, the Democrats' Big Media acolytes have avoided the report like it was carrying swine flu germs.

Gallup's dismay at the results is palpable throughout their report on the new survey.
They even gave the release a misleading title, "Many in U.S. See Health Insurance as Personal Responsibility," rather than the more accurate, Majority in U.S. See Health Insurance as Personal Responsibility.

While they spun the title, Gallup couldn't actually spin the hard numbers, so they quickly pointed out, "Other national polls on this topic have found a higher degree of public support for government involvement in guaranteeing healthcare coverage..." Then Gallup disclosed that "those (poll) question wordings do not provide a non-governmental alternative."

In other words, the Gallup release admits that its previous surveys about whether the government, or the folks themselves, should be responsible for their health insurance omitted the half of the equation dealing with individual responsibility.

A noggin-scratcher that might even qualify you for psychiatric counseling under Obamacare: How is that even possible? How can you ask someone, Which do you prefer a or b?, if you don't even mention b?

Answer: It ain't easy.

Let's look at the question asked in Gallup's recent survey, the one that showed Americans think folks ought to be responsible.


<<< "Which comes closer to your view about health insurance--[the government should be primarily responsible for making sure all Americans have health insurance (or) Americans themselves should be primarily responsible for making sure they and their families have health insurance]?" >>>


A little wordy, but given the multiple choice nature of the question, otherwise relatively plain. And, when given a clear choice, a majority of folks chose individual responsibility.

Now, the question which Gallup says it has asked in previous surveys:



<<< "Do you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage, or is that not the responsibility of the federal government?" >>>


No mention of any other option, just the government one.

This is the equivalent of, during last year's election, a poll asking, Who do you plan to vote for, Barack Obama ... or someone not named Barack Obama? Although, the way things are going, that could be a survey question they actually use in 2012.

The Gallup release highlights that similar polls from the New York Times/CBS and Fox News asked the same question in almost identical language. None of these surveys gave folks an option, other than government responsibility, for health insurance.

Even so, all three of the surveys find public support for government healthcare eroding.

Gallup says that, using their a, or non-a, question, support for government responsibility for healthcare was down to 54% the last time they used it (in November of last year) from an all-time high of 69%.

In September, only 51% of the respondents agreed when the CBS/New York Times poll asked them, "Do you think the federal government should guarantee health insurance for all Americans, or isn't this the responsibility of the federal government?" That's the same number that agreed when the Fox News poll asked in July, "Do you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to make sure all Americans have healthcare, or is that not the responsibility of the federal government?"

As with Gallup, both those surveys showed public support for government control slipping.

Even when asked a multiple choice question with only one choice, folks are just plain reluctant to cede government with responsibility for their healthcare.

When finally given an option, in this most recent Gallup poll, most Americans side with individual responsibility over government oversight when it comes to healthcare.

William Tate is an award-winning journalist and author

americanthinker.com



To: Sully- who wrote (74767)10/8/2009 4:15:57 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
The Obama Justice Department’s Secret Blogging Team… Is it Illegal?

Liberal posters - why isn't the Dept of Justice paying you to propagandize? Contact the Justice Dept and demand to be put on the payroll! This is truly the Axelturf administration.


(Read WP posts from Warner Todd Huston) | (Read MT posts from Warner Todd Huston)

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, has apparently hired a cadre of left-wing, Democrat campaign bloggers to troll through the Internet looking for news stories and blog posts that denigrate the Obama agenda. After such websites are found it is the job of these secret lefty bloggers to leave comments that come to the support of Obamaism in the comments sections. It seems that Eric Holder has created his own little propaganda unit in a valiant effort to become the Bloggi Riefenstahl of the Obama era.

As reported at The Muffled Oar, a blog that first broke the story of Holder’s secretive blogging unit — dubbed the “Blog Squad” by blogger Isaac Muzzey — Holder has housed this unit in the Office of Public Affairs at the Department of Justice. It also appears that former John Edwards staffer Tracy Russo is part of this special unit.

A site called whorunsgov.com reported back in May that DOJ hired Russo to do “media outreach for the whole department.” It is, according to whorunsgov.com, the first time such an effort has been made at DOJ.

Of Russo’s duties, The Muffled Oar says:

Not only is the Department of Justice Blog Squad going to reach out to nontraditional media like TPM Muckraker or the Muffled Oar, but they are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments at conservative leaning blogs such as the Free Republic. They are also tasked with fostering anonymous comments, or comments under pseudonyms, at newspaper websites with stories critical of the Department of Justice, Holder and President Obama.

If indeed this is what DOJ media outreach does it would most certainly qualify as “astroturfing.” Astroturfing is the action of using fake commenters and multiple screen names on all sorts of sites to push a similar opinion to create the appearance of a grass roots movement and make it seem as if there are all sorts of individuals naturally supporting a product or political movement.

It most certainly is a creepy, propagandistic sort of effort that Holder’s office is involved in and it is one that certainly seems an immoral one. After all, it most certainly is lying to the public if there are a handful of DOJ employees casting about on hundreds of different websites pretending that they are just your average citizen coming to the support of the Obama administration. But is it illegal? Hans von Spakovsky of National Review’s the corner blog certainly thinks so.

I doubt that the Office of Public Affairs (OPA) has received an ethics opinion from Justice’s Professional Responsibility Advisory Office (PRAO) saying that it is acceptable for OPA employees to be harassing critics of the department through postings that deliberately hide their DOJ affiliation (a practice that is not very “open” or “transparent”). DOJ lawyers also ought to be aware of ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4, which states that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. If the report in The Muffled Oar is correct, tax dollars are being used directly for such dishonest, deceitful behavior.

I must say, it’s hard to disagree with von Spakovsky (if that’s his real name! — a little joke there).

Mr. von Spakovsky also makes a perfectly pertinent point to wrap up his blog post on this matter. He wonders if the Obama administration will ever learn the difference between political campaign and the “entirely different responsibility it now has to enforce this nation’s laws in an objective, nonpartisan, nonpolitical manner”?

I think that the question is a good one. After all, after nearly a year in office, we have yet to see the end Obama’s constant blaming of Bush for every little problem he runs up against not to mention the constant campaign speeches and appearances on TV at every hour, day and night. One gets the uneasy feeling that President Barack Obama has yet to put in an actual day’s work as he constantly campaigns for office instead.

rightwingnews.com