SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gvatty who wrote (261786)10/9/2009 2:39:15 PM
From: WindsockRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Your understanding is far from perfect, in many respects.

Notably, Intel did appeal the Korean FTC decision. A major issue is that the FTC did not make a finding of consumer injury that the Korean Supreme Court ruled was a requirement. A serious flaw in your perfect understanding that Intel did not appeal.

Notably again, neither the Japanese nor Korean FTC held anything like an evidentiary hearing that is a key due process feature of a Court proceeding or anything that looks like a fair process. Both Commissions just issued a Finding after conducting an investigation



To: gvatty who wrote (261786)10/9/2009 4:46:12 PM
From: Elmer PhudRespond to of 275872
 
gvatty -

I see you are unfamiliar with the facts. Fortunately another poster has explained things to you. I'll just reiterate, Intel has never been found guilty of anything when it's had the opportunity to present it's side of the story.

Baaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News