SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quehubo who wrote (124799)10/11/2009 9:44:19 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206145
 
"I dont know why you would want to use NG to reduce coal demand. It appears ng as a fuel for transportation would be a wiser use, both from an environmental standpoint and an economic one."

Well, if we wanted to significantly reduce CO2 emissions right now it could be done by maximizing NG utilization and shutting down coal fired units. This could be done today as the capacity is in place. NG transportation vehicles are not in place.

This would screw a lot of coal contracts - such would have to be compensated - assuming contract law means anything anymore.



To: quehubo who wrote (124799)10/12/2009 11:05:18 AM
From: jrzy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206145
 
Why not both.
It looks like there will be enough NG to replace both coal for power generation, and oil for transportation.