Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Koligman who wrote (10389)	10/13/2009 11:33:22 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 42652

Obamacare will deny coverage if you are over weight, smoke, drink. Watch and learn How many people die with good health coverage ?

To: John Koligman who wrote (10389)	10/13/2009 11:57:26 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 42652

Video: 6-year-old faces 45 days in reform school posted at 10:12 am on October 13, 2009 by Ed Morrissey Zero tolerance policies do nothing but allow schools and school districts a way to avoid using proper judgment in settling issues on campuses. If one needed any more proof of this, look no further than the six-year-old boy who may spend 45 days in reform school for bringing a Cub Scout camping utensil tool to school. Yes, it contains a knife … and a fork … and a spoon: Video Link The New York Times asked the salient question this weekend: Spurred in part by the Columbine and Virginia Tech shootings, many school districts around the country adopted zero-tolerance policies on the possession of weapons on school grounds. More recently, there has been growing debate over whether the policies have gone too far. But, based on the code of conduct for the Christina School District, where Zachary is a first grader, school officials had no choice. They had to suspend him because, "regardless of possessor's intent," knives are banned. But the question on the minds of residents here is: Why do school officials not have more discretion in such cases? "Zachary wears a suit and tie some days to school by his own choice because he takes school so seriously," said Debbie Christie, Zachary's mother, who started a Web site, helpzachary.com, in hopes of recruiting supporters to pressure the local school board at its next open meeting on Tuesday. "He is not some sort of threat to his classmates." Still, some school administrators argue that it is difficult to distinguish innocent pranks and mistakes from more serious threats, and that the policies must be strict to protect students. Well, here's the first problem. Policies don't protect children; teachers and administrators protect children at school. It's almost as if the districts use their policies as totems or charms, thinking that if they wave them at everybody, they'll all be safe without having to take responsibility for using judgment in applying them. It's the new bureaucratic superstition, and it leads to absurdities such as tossing a six-year-old into reform school for taking his new Cub Scout accessory to school. Real security requires judgment and adults willing to take some responsibility. At its heart, the slavish devotion to the letter of zero-tolerance policies is nothing more than passing the buck, a craven attempt at CYA while posing as defenders of children. There is a vast qualitative difference between a child who brings a Cub Scout utensil and another who waves a switchblade at other kids, and to treat them the same is not just insane, it's counterproductive to the end goal of school safety. The school board meets tonight at 7:30 pm in the Christina School District in Newark, Delaware. Hopefully the Christies get plenty of support from their community and stop the assignment of Zacahary to a reform school for nine weeks Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: 6-year-old faces 45 days in reform school (13 October 2009) hotair.com

To: John Koligman who wrote (10389)	10/13/2009 3:26:14 PM
From: Lane3	1 Recommendation Respond to of 42652

I think we have more than a few 'anomalies' to fix... I wouldn't be anywhere near as cranky about the proposals if they would be instrumental in solving the actual problems, whether "anomaly" level problems or crisis level problems. They're doing all this stuff and upending everything yet they won't achieve universal care nor will they bring down costs, the stated objectives. Those can't be dismissed as "anomalies." Those are the essence of the perceived need of the reformers for reform.