Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (10407)	10/13/2009 6:04:09 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 42652

That's the time frame Stiglitz picked For the record, and FWIW <g>, the Stiglitz piece was not posted until after I asked the question about the eight years so it could not have been the basis for the discussion.

To: TimF who wrote (10407)	10/14/2009 12:08:45 PM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Is Health Care Reform Falling Apart? 13 Oct 2009 12:21 pm Michael Cannon asks whether health care take over is doomed. Democrats entertained a bunch of vague fantasies about some giant pool of money materializing from somewhere to close the gaps in the budget. It hasn't, so they're stuck with, as Cannon points out, taxing Democrats: ¦Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) is the biggest opponent of Sen. Max Baucus' (D-MT) tax on expensive health plans because that tax would hit West Virginia coal miners. ¦Unions vigorously oppose that tax because it would hit their members. ¦Moderate Democrats in the House oppose Rep. Charlie Rangel's (D-NY) supposed "millionaires surtax" because they know it would hit small businesses in their districts. Cannon says: Once the shooting starts, industry opposition will sway even Democratic members, because there are physicians and hospitals and employers and insurance-industry employees in every state and congressional district. Can President Obama and the congressional leadership satisfy both groups? My guess is, probably not, and this misguided effort at "reform" will therefore die. Again. That's a bold prediction. I'm skeptical. I think it is more likely is that this thing passes, and fails spectacularly. There are too many moving parts, and if any of them breaks, the whole thing rapidly starts to spin out of control and eat a gigantic hole in the deficit. If it does break, I think that Democrats keep control of Congress just long enough to explain why they keep having to enact whopping new tax increases every few years. Republicans don't need to improve their message. They just have to wait for Democrats to recover their reputation as tax and spend politicians who woefully underpredict the cost of everything they propose. Time will tell which one of us is right--if either. This is one time I'd be happy for my predictions to fail in both directions. meganmcardle.theatlantic.com