Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (520417)	10/13/2009 6:39:14 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575424

"The statement you made which I put into quotes when I responded with .." And which I countered. Lucidly, unlike your post which seems to be in its own reality on tangentially connected with our own. "Hard to miss it was the only thing in the post and you managed to miss it though." And then you illustrate so kindly. I didn't miss it. You didn't support it and went straight to the ad hominem attack. Like you did in succeeding posts. "The one I am responding to for starters." Thank you for making my point. Again. "Your statement that I can't craft an argument is glaringly false on the surface, as I've engaged in numerous disputes and I'm quite certain many arguments I have laid out have been well supported." Hate to break it to you, but waving your hands and bloviating is not a "well supported" argument. No matter how many big words you mis-spell and mis-use. Now, it might wow them while you are betting on rooster or dog fights, but you really need to do more. But, I digress. For even the most moderately aware, they would realize I was talking about those posts in particular. You have a very bad habit of throwing up straw men and pretending that is the topic under discussion. "Also when I put into quotes a statement that I declare is not true and you are unable to determine what I am calling not true" And you kindly provide yet another example. You are pretending that my post consisted of only the one line. Which it didn't. I can understand why you might want to ignore it, it must have been pretty uncomfortable. But to use it as an example of delusional behavior(which it wouldn't have been, but you might not understand what constitutes such, so...) is a little beyond the pale don't you think? Oh, probably not. You probably think you were being clever...