SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mph who wrote (328953)10/13/2009 11:15:06 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794008
 
Nixon's aides said to him why do you go after the MSM, he replied a President never shoots down



To: mph who wrote (328953)10/14/2009 1:12:43 AM
From: KLP2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794008
 
Crybaby Obama, and his WH WahWah team won't like this either

FOX NEWS - You decide….

Is it appropriate for the White House to use the stature of the office and a taxpayer-funded blog to wage attacks on the press?

foxnews.com

Yes. The president has every right to defend himself by any means against all attacks and opposing viewpoints, even from the press.

Yes. But if the president disagrees with the press he should respond directly, not through proxies, and not by using a taxpayer funded blog -- his staff just sound like whiners.

No. The press has a duty and right to present opposing viewpoints. The attacks demean the office of the president.
Undecided.

Thank you for voting!

Yes. The president has every right to defend himself by any means against all attacks and opposing viewpoints, even from the press. 4% (2,577 votes)

Yes. But if the president disagrees with the press he should respond directly, not through proxies, and not by using a taxpayer funded blog -- his staff just sound like whiners. 8% (4,875 votes)

No. The press has a duty and right to present opposing viewpoints. The attacks demean the office of the president. 88% (54,092 votes)

Undecided. <1% (133 votes)
Total Votes: 61,677



To: mph who wrote (328953)10/14/2009 10:55:43 AM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794008
 
He's all wah wah'd up.