Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (27645)	10/13/2009 11:01:19 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<Why not? {call God a person} God may be, undoubtedly is, a much more advanced person in ways we can't imagine > You answer your question in the next sentance. <(perhaps he is something more than a person as well as being a person), > Could be.. but hardly a refutation of NOT calling God a person... eye of the beholder I suppose. <but our not calling God a person would imply we think he's less than a person.> Again, eye of the beholder I suppose.. to me that's silly, BWTFDIK. <Extraordinarily presumptious of us.> Same as above... to me that refers to God as a person. dAK