Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (261891)	10/14/2009 10:35:21 AM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Evidently, Intel has no evidence at all. How would you know? You're so used to AMD's crybaby antics of badmouthing in the press that you think that's the way companies should behave. You don't know adult behavior when you see it.

To: fastpathguru who wrote (261891)	10/14/2009 11:22:46 AM
From: fastpathguru	Respond to of 275872

What you keep calling hearsay could (in US courts) in fact NOT be hearsay, if used to show the state of mind of the participants at the time rather than the truth of the matter at hand. Another exception to the hearsay rule in the US for emails is that if presented to show conflicting statements (again rather than the "truth of the matter") they are not considered hearsay. And when lots of these are mutually corroborative... Well, the phrase "pattern of conduct" comes to mind. Again, note that Intel itself does not bring up a hearsay argument in its appeal. curia.europa.eu fpg