SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (25472)10/14/2009 5:14:52 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 36921
 
Robert, I have pondered Malthusian and Club of Rome ideology for decades. It's simplistic thinking.

I have seen swarms of Indians and hordes of Chinese up close and personal and there didn't seem to be too many of them.

<Use limited resources, unlimted wants, extreme population growth and pollution as your variables. >

Quite right - boundary conditions are what matter.

Of course 1000 quadrillion people would make things a bit too crowded [but I admit I haven't worked that out on a per square metre basis]. But extreme population growth isn't what we are faced with. After decades of pondering, I came up with Peak People happening in 2037 [catastrophes excluded which could bring that forward].

While people were still moaning about the terrible Malthusian human population bomb, I had decided they were wrong and population implosion was a sure bet. Now, people have started to understand that people do not in fact just go on reproducing like rabbits.

The invention of low cost convenient contraception has made a big difference to the world.

Japan, Germany, Russia, China, Italy are all big countries with population reductions already a certainty. We don't even need to guess now. Japan is on the way down. Others will follow.

Resources, pollution and "unlimited wants" are not particularly difficult problems either. People don't have "unlimited wants". They have wants they can afford. Some vote for government departments to rob others to provide them the wants they can't afford themselves but that's a fool's game which reduce what they get, not increase it [in the long run]. Pollution control is simple. Resources are available at current prices more or less for any amount.

I have done enough population pondering, years ago, and have moved onto other pondering.

No worries Robert, it's all doable.

The more the merrier.

Mqurice



To: FJB who wrote (25472)10/14/2009 5:15:02 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
If we would have listened to you there never would have been a Leonardo da Vinci. We need more people not less. People are good and capable of incredible things. You are no judge.

en.wikipedia.org