SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fastpathguru who wrote (261966)10/15/2009 11:59:02 AM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Can you not read?

"The meet comp response enabled Intel to [...] maintain 100% Intel NB CPU MSS at Lenovo worldwide."


You're the one who can't read. I said you already listed it as proof of coercion.

According to you, 100% share is proof of coercion except when it isn't. Intel managers are so well trained in what is and isn't permissible under the law that you actually claim that he's boasting about breaking the law in his highlites and Intel is awarding him in a quarterly BUM (business update meeting) for explicit anti-trust violations????? Now you're entering Dan3 territory!!

Was it an evil award presented by Dr Evil?

You kill me. What a hoot!



To: fastpathguru who wrote (261966)10/16/2009 12:10:17 PM
From: WindsockRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Apparently you are not aware that "Meet Comp" stands for meet competition. The "Meet Comp" process begins when the buyer says: "Hey, AMD is giving me a better deal." Intel responds by giving the buyer a new offer with a lower price and perhaps better terms to match the AMD offer. The competition can continue through more than one round until someone wins the order.

In the Lenova case in the email, competition worked; Lenova achieved lower costs and one of the two competitors -- Intel -- won the business and the other -- AMD -- lost. The "Meet Comp" process is a legal safe harbor to defeat legal claims from a sore loser, like AMD.

Every time the NFL plays a game on Sunday, one team wins and one team loses. The only thing the losers get is "nice try guys" and a chance to win the next game. AMD deserves no better and neither does Intel on the occasions when Intel loses a sale competing with AMD at HP, Dell or some other buyer.