Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (27674)	10/16/2009 12:46:33 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 28931

<Trinity interact and constitute a singular Godhead is completely irrelevant to whether or not God's essential nature is personal vs impersonal.> Poppycock... that would depend on what your definition of "personal' or "impersonal" : ardictionary.com As opposed to your definition of 'personal' has infinite meanings and pertains to all life as far as I can see... so you must elaborate. <As such it becomes just another red herring> Yes, you're claim to understand it sure does. <Give me a break!> Yes, the typical response when your assertion (about grateful) has been shown false. dAK

To: Greg or e who wrote (27674)	10/16/2009 1:18:11 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 28931

Let's repeat this... as you're looking less Christian all the time... Huh... you your god isn't omnipresent... huh. I guess you're no more Christian than I am! I'm in again, and you're out. While you dither over my affirming "personal God", which by your definition is really simply anything with conciousness (so, oh yea... I qualify!! YEAH!)... but so lot's of Eastern religions and 'new agy' types you seem to disprove of: amazon.com In fact, their god is Omnipresent and concious... huh! They seem to have quite a few Christian attributes! DAK