Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (262014)	10/16/2009 10:43:39 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

I'd agree with you if it weren't for the whole bunch of co-corroborating evidence (affidavits, emails, timing and economic analysis of rebates, competitive environment, and actual cancellation of in-progress product development of products based on sales that AMD had already won) that indicates Intel demanded exclusivity to get the rebates. 2 things, #1 None of your references indicate Intel required exclusivity. Yes, Intel got exclusivity but that doesn't prove they required it. #2 Considering the extensive training all Intel employees receive, as well as the extended training higher level managers receive, the accomplishments the manager listed showed beyond any doubt that his actions clearly fell within his guidelines. Furthermore, he received an award for securing the 100% share account. That process requires review at the highest level. Further confirmation that the deal meet all guidelines. Apparently you didn't realize it at the time but your mention of this as confirmation of illegal activity couldn't possibly be more wrong unless you actually believe in the before mentioned "Dr Evil" corporate culture where awards are given for the most diabolical acts. So, either you are delusional in believing Intel has such a corporate culture ala Dan3 or you provided the perfect example of why your reasoning is flawed. Either Intel encourages and awards what it knows to be illegal or it awards what it knows to be perfectly within the guidelines. It's got to be one or the other and you blew it either way.