Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (262025)	10/17/2009 3:51:01 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

fgp - Get a clue. The extension of your logic was hypothetical. Nehalem is compelling, therefore Nehalem is anti-competitive, therefore Nehalem is a violation of anti-competitive law. It's not hard to see where your tortured reasoning leads us. Your continuous references to cherry picked excerpts, while excluding any evidence which may contradict it, is simply a feeble attempt to justify not directly questioning the participants involved. Actually questioning those participants is the last thing AMD and the EUC want because it can do nothing but hurt their case. It could clear up the ambiguity, or confirm that what you claim to be true is true. Too big a chance for them to take voluntarily.