Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 9:33:49 AM
From: Oral Roberts	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224748

CBO finds Dem bill with public option reduces deficit What a crock of shit. A trillion in new spending ain't going to cut the deficit and if you truly believe it will your even more ignorant then you sound and I don't know how that could be possible.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 9:35:58 AM
From: Little Joe	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224748

ridiculous lj

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 9:37:02 AM
From: Oral Roberts	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

New record low for Teleprompter Jesus.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 9:48:42 AM
From: JakeStraw	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Thanks to to Obama and the Dems the U.S. dollar is seeing new lows every day... They need to cut spending NOW!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 2:56:38 PM
From: chartseer	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Oh bummer! Four and a half years of the ten years costs without government health care. How in the world can that be an accurate cost? Only Washington bureaucrats and their stooges would quote those figures as the estimated costs for ten tears of health care. It is ten years of paying for five and a half years of health care for $871 billion. What is the cost estimate for the next ten years? Now if you divide 871 by 5.5 it comes out to $153 billion a year. Multiply this by 10, for ten years costs, and it gives you 1.58 Trillion for a ten year period using the Dem figures and basic elementary school math. 871 billion using bureaucrats washingtonian math. 1.58 trillion using their figures with elementary school math. Which total is closer to the actual cost? Neither. comrade chartseer

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (73890)	10/21/2009 2:56:45 PM
From: chartseer	Respond to of 224748

Oh bummer! Four and a half years of the ten years costs without government health care. How in the world can that be an accurate cost? Only Washington bureaucrats and their stooges would quote those figures as the estimated costs for ten tears of health care. It is ten years of paying for five and a half years of health care for $871 billion. What is the cost estimate for the next ten years? Now if you divide 871 by 5.5 it comes out to $153 billion a year. Multiply this by 10, for ten years costs, and it gives you 1.58 Trillion for a ten year period using the Dem figures and basic elementary school math. 871 billion using bureaucrats washingtonian math. 1.58 trillion using their figures with elementary school math. Which total is closer to the actual cost? Neither. comrade chartseer