Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (522649)	10/22/2009 9:38:25 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580262

Not if you're uninsured... or underinsured. Untrue. And you know that other countries get better results on many, many metrics. You can create irrelevant metrics where this is true, but meaningful metrics, not really. Another RW lie.

To: Road Walker who wrote (522649)	10/26/2009 1:31:09 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580262

The CBO say the Senate bill will leave 17M uninsured. Out of 30M cited by Obama. If the whole reason for this power grab is really to insure the uninsured, why aren't they proposing to do it? ---------------------------------------------------- We already have medicare and medicaid. How about providing adding a catastrophic insurance component to medicaid for: 1) those who aren't covered by a current policy (employer, private, medicaid, medicare, VA, etc) and 2a) have been turned down by three insurance companies or 2b) have been quoted a price for catastophic care that is more than 10% of their previous years taxable income.