Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (9664)	10/25/2009 10:21:59 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24213

Speed-Riding the Rails National Network Could Cost $600B Friday, October 23, 2009 By Audrey Dutton WASHINGTON — The development of a 17,000-mile national high-speed rail network would cost $600 billion, or $30 billion per year through 2030, Andy Kunz, president and chief executive officer of the U. S. High Speed Rail Association, said here at a conference yesterday. Kunz’s estimate seems to put into context — and illustrate the meagerness of — the $8 billion that Congress provided for high-speed rail in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act enacted in February. The $8 billion is “not going to go very far, and we know that,” Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Tex., said during the conference, which the association sponsored to promote the development of high-speed rail corridors designated by the Federal Railroad Administration and the linking of them into a national network. Several members of Congress and Pennsylvania Gov. Edward G. Rendell, who also spoke at the conference, called for varying levels of funding and methods of paying for high-speed rail. Rep. Ciro Rodriguez, D-Tex., said that federal contributions of $5 billion or more per year for 10 years — or at least $50 billion total — would be necessary to build a national network. Rendell called for the creation of a national infrastructure bank that would finance rail corridors, in addition to other infrastructure projects. Though the $8 billion provided so far seems small compared to Kunz’s $600 billion estimate, momentum in Congress has been growing for high-speed rail funding. A House subcommittee hearing last week drew a standing-room only crowd. A multi-year transportation bill pending in the House Transportation Committee would provide up to 80% of high-speed rail corridor planning costs, as long as at least 20% of the funding came from state or local coffers. It would allow public-private partnerships to fund high-speed rail projects. It also would require the transportation secretary to create a high-speed rail corridor development program and to provide competitive grants to projects aligned with that program. The U.S. High Speed Rail Association was formed in July “to help advance [President Obama’s] visionary plan” for high-speed rail. In a press release announcing its formation, the group called for a “state-of-the-art dedicated track, advanced control systems, elegant multi-modal train stations, and top-of-the-line 220 mph trains.” Its board includes Norman F. Anderson, president and chief executive officer of CG/LA Infrastructure LLC; Katherine Aguilar Perez, executive director of the Urban Land Institute, Los Angeles District Council; and Anthony Perl, urban studies program director at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. bondbuyer.com