To: james flannigan who wrote (67756 ) 10/30/2009 11:22:30 AM From: E. Charters 3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78403 Wayside did have good results, and was in a historic mined area, which was narrow vein, and high sulfide. So high sulfide in some areas, that it was difficult to assay. A case in point was the Mosquito Creek Gold Mine, a bollixed mine by virtue of its 2 compartment shaft and its roustabout underfunded staff. 1/2 ounce per ton, 100 tons per day, and no profit. Hecla took over the company, another consolidated wonder, of the name Mosquito Creek, and promptly closed the mine down when they saw the true balance sheet. Hecla could have improved things, but did not see a way, probably because of the meagre tonnage. Lesson in life, always sink three compartment shafts even on prospects as it is hellish hard to remove all the timbers, slash out and start over. Mucking out the bottom of the shaft after every blast poses logistic problems. Trying to catch your blast with platforms or chutes is just as bad. There is a way to do it with a bottom drift, cross over drift, ore chute pocket etc.. but it ain't easy as you have to retimber from the top down from staging. Sounds like it needs 500K tons to even consider. I don't think MC had 150K tons. There is lots of other stuff on the fairly long Barkerville trend, and it deserved some look see. Wayside allegedly had some wide low grade OP zones at one time, if you could believe the data. I did not see why you could not. It fell on hard times when the gold times got bad late 90's. Then they found the Bonanza Ledge, which sounded wonderful but it did not get any attention from the company beyond one or two holes. The recent redrilling was supposed to be a step out from the Ledge. I think it could be. then they did a way out drill hole on another zone and started to arm wave about what could be in between. Classic promotion. Deserved? hmmmm.. When they fell on hard times, they diluted to keep the phone bill paid. Not much choice there. But is there technical merit to the property? I would say reservedly yes. The Ledge thingie seems like it could be pumping a drill hole, as it never saw real work after the blow out. Naturally all the goldze will pump their wares when the metal hits the highs. What you want to distinguish is the fair chance stuff from the crank up the sheets news mongers. I am not sure the difference is eminently clear in this business. I am wait-and-see on the in-fill drilling. I never had a breath of suspicion that the area 'as a hole' was unfairly touted, as it has globs of gold for 100's of years, and the OP zone looked fairly drilled. The chiefest objection I had was the negative attitude of the BC government in issuing permits and the hillside nature of the deposit, which while not a show stopper looked a little bit hazy in the erosion and permitting area. It's a maybe in BC, as any mining seems to be eternally, since the NDP outlook took hold back in 1980. "Put em in jail if they bend a blade of grass." Too many issues of Beautiful British Columbia have fixed in the minds of politicians forever that we can only ever stare at the mountains in frozen wonder, and never pick up axe or drill to do some work, or the majestic hills will crumble to the sea, denuded of fauna, flora and devoid of purest babbling brook. Hell it's just real estate with shrubs and rodents, just more vertical and visible. Quo Vadis oh WYG and Barkerville, of Billy Barker fame and the ghosts of 10,000 Cornish placer miners? Of the fabulous placer gold of Wildhorse Creek? Will you ever shake your curse of evil old F. Callaghan and his straight-arrow down-dip drill? Will the true potential of your 21 miles strike and 7 old mines ever come back to shine again in the spring of warm mountain mining sunshine? Or will moonshine and blarney remain a fleeting spectre that forever haunts the hills of this once fecund and bustling gold mining area, and chase investors jibbering and frothing back to Peru? We await developments. EC<:-}