Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anne Lamb who wrote (23915)	10/31/1997 12:47:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 35569

So its against SI's policy to post home or work numbers, but it apparently is not against SI's policy to make unsubstantiated slanderous accusations? I would ask that anyone who printed out the post, to repost it without the phone numbers. Then we will see if SI's policy is to allow unsubstantiated accusations to stand, but to remove substantiated accusations.

To: Anne Lamb who wrote (23915)	10/31/1997 12:52:00 PM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

Re: SI Polcies Thanks for checking with Jill, Anne. Neither the word "phone" nor the word "number" appears in SI's terms of use. I have never seen a reference to any policy other than the "Terms of Use" link. It would be nice if they provded a Talmud to go with their Torah. Pý

To: Anne Lamb who wrote (23915)	10/31/1997 12:52:00 PM
From: Furry Otter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

<<Its against SI policy to let anyone post home or work numbers>> Not by my reading of the "Terms of Use" statement...I am inquiring as we speak. BTW, a charitable soul sent me the first part of post, containing all the so-called prohibited info. Thank you, I had not seen that, it must have already been removed when I first saw Lew's posts. Regards, Otter