Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (10875)	10/29/2009 5:09:33 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Respond to of 42652

C4C didn't save them from bankruptcy, Obama giving them billions did. And most of the cars bought were not GM or Chyslers are you saying Edmunds is biased and has an agenda ?? Hey they are not ABC,NBC,CBS,NPR, PBS

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (10875)	10/29/2009 5:28:58 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Not if the number 124 was fictitious and made up only to support a story about how expensive potatoes were. So, then, if 124,000 is fictitious, how many clunker sales were there? What was the cost per car sold under the program? The potato farmers were paid keeping the banks from seizing their farms. The potato farmers get to keep their farms for a while, but for how long? Remember that there are a lot of potatoes in a lot of root sellers so they won't be buying any potatoes any time soon. The banks could be coming after them again any time now. So then what do you do? Pay them $24 per potato again? Let the banks have them? Or what? I would not be arguing this point had the farms been saved rather than their loss just postponed.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (10875)	10/29/2009 5:58:29 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 42652

Taxpayers Paid $24,000 per Cash for Clunkers Car breitbart.tv