SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CO who wrote (5)10/31/1997 2:04:00 PM
From: franco  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11708
 
WELL THATS SOME E-MAIL!!! The CSMA shorts are getting
SQUEEZED HARD TODAY!!! One thing though, the contact
at GFC Communications is Jeff Plank 516-655-7575.

I think the wrong # is posted in the E-mail.

Good luck! LETS SQUEEZE THOSE SHORTS HARD!!!!!!



To: CO who wrote (5)5/2/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: KZAP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11708
 
Cheryl,

Who was this from? Post #5.
There was a lot of good info in the post, however at this time
outdated of course. Very interesting to go back and read old
posts from time to time. A lot of things that were good then
are better now. Some of the posted items were off base and have
still not come to fruition. Some are to take place in the
very near future.

Undervalued? Now more than ever IMHO.

Happy investing!
GO CSMA!

KZAP



To: CO who wrote (5)10/21/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Blackie D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11708
 
Who remembers this excerpt from a PR last year?

"An institutional research firm, M3, Inc., has initiated research coverage on CSMA. M3 will also assist the co. in SELECTING and FUNDING oil and gas projects. M3 specializes in emerging, energy-related PUBLIC companies".

I think some of this deserves a little revisiting. And, I would like to start with the coincidental selection of one of Mike Picken's holdings, complete with EPA 2 mil cleanup price tag, as one of CSMA's partnership projects with M3.

Seems to me (MO), that the property was hand-picked, and ANY energy-related company would've probably been suitable to work with on this project, as long as they agreed to buy the property from Mike, in turn, saving him (possibly M3) 2 mil. in EPA clean-up fees.

So, why the coverage?