Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (10910)	10/30/2009 2:59:31 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

He has lots and lots of associates. Why then did Obama appoint the man responsible for Marc Rich's pardon to AG? There must have been thousands of qualified candidates who were not radically controversial. Yet he chose to spend every Saturday for a year will Rob Blagoyovich. Yet he chose to spend twenty years of Sundays listening to a radical preacher spew hate. YYet he appears ot have asked a radical terrorist to ghost write his book. Yet he is married to a woman who is not quite as discrete as he is about their common interest in Alinsky. (etc. ad infinitum) I get it, you won't admit to seeing the handwriting no matter how plain it is. No it's not radical. It's mainstream environmental protection. Mainstream environmental protection? ROTFLMHO Radical is now mainstream? NO IT IS NOT. The intent to destroy the US economy is not mainstream! Obama is a radical anti-statist. even if that made Michelle a radical, it wouldn't mean that her husband is one. But he is. I believe you know it. It may be a statement in a book written by a radical ... Yet who would quote from a book they didn't find interesting. I have read thousands of books. I couldn't quote from the ones I didn't take great interest in. I may not be able to quote from a specific one I did. If I read it enough times I might be able to quote it even years later. Remember that Rush is an entertainer. You at least get that. He is an editorialist, just like the talking heads on most nightly "news" shows. The big difference is he is honest that he is giving opinion, while they try to pretend they are bearers of news. And as far as quotes go, Michelle and Barry can be hoisted by their own quotes. Nobody has to make them up to degrade them. Take this bit from his book, for example Out of context.