Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (525485)	11/3/2009 10:52:32 AM
From: Road Walker	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1584048

I wouldn't have said it if he hadn't done it. LOL from the biggest liar on SI.

To: i-node who wrote (525485)	11/3/2009 12:16:01 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1584048

I wouldn't have said it if he hadn't done it. How you try to take the edge off the spending bill is something. There is no legislation in the history of this nation that comes anywhere close to spending the kind of money the porkulus did. This isn't a subject about which there is debate. Simply tell me which legislation in our history spent more money if you disagree. There is no "limited" definition of spending. You either spend or you don't, and in this case there were something like 3,500 earmarks. A total waste of our children's money. You frigging ignoramous stuck in the dark ages of Reagan. Every frigging nation in the world that could had a stimulus bill. Just because you are so frigging partisan that you refuse to admit we were on the verge of a depression DOES NOT change the reality. In fact, China wants everyone to continue stimulating their economies and that's because we are not out of the woods yet. God, you're like the frigging hapless moron in a disney cartoon. Are you sure you got a university degree? I have some strong doubts!