To: KyrosL who wrote (57475 ) 11/4/2009 4:33:16 PM From: Maurice Winn 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219845 Huh? Of course. That's the whole point of Tradable Citizenship. The owner of it gets total, full and compete citizenship and ownership of the issuing country. <Would you allow anyone in possession into the country? > For example, suppose you had bought a NZ one 20 years ago to enjoy some nice weather during the northern winter. But now you don't want it any more because you have decided to return to die in ancestral Athens. You might sell it by agreement to ElM or TJ or put it on eBay or TradeMe and sell it to the highest bidder. Or gift it to a descendant. Or just let it lapse on your demise. If you had voted along with the rest of the citizens to make it even better you could sell at a big profit, so you would have enjoyed the benefits of citizenship and made a lot of money as well. You could have contracted with an insurer to transfer the citizenship to them on your demise via an annuity agreement with you being paid some monthly amount of cash for 20 years. The buyer would take over your rights. They could just keep it as an investment, profiting by selling it at a higher price in a decade or so as the value keeps increasing. Or they might go to live in NZ and become a Kiwi, digging tuatuas, having BBQs, swimming in clean ocean water and breathing clean southern hemisphere air fresh of the oceans with no snakes, cane toads, and few sharp things other than the murderous weaponry of the welfare state trainees [which will have a short half-life once Tradable Citizenships are introduced]. There wouldn't need to be swarms of thieving crooked immigration scamsters getting their free citizenships now issued. Phillip Field is now gaoled for being a criminal minister of the evil-doing Helengrad Labour government. He was scamming the immigration rort . stuff.co.nz The present communist/socialist/hippie commune favouritism approach to citizenship destroys value, rather than creates it. Mqurice